Hypan ID please

Jackson

Member
Jan 14, 2011
787
0
16
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Here are two videos of the fish in question. I think they are 129. They were being moved so I figured I would get an ID while I have them out

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gcmQcODnt1k&hd=1"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gcmQcODnt1k&hd=1[/ame]

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dnl76Xu5YHQ&hd=1"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dnl76Xu5YHQ&hd=1[/ame]
 
Last edited:

Irene0100

UK Support Team
May 14, 2009
4,271
0
36
Norfolk, UK
Hi , yes could be 129, or young L270. if they stay small then will be 129, the choc zebs get a big bigger. do you know how old they are?
 
J

jamous91

Guest
L204 is Panaque not Hypancistrus
so... i do not not get you point ( sorry if this soudes rude and nasty it did not mean to) i was just saying from the pic i have in my book is looks like L204 aka flash pleco
 

JoePlec

Member
Aug 27, 2010
786
0
16
Rainhill, Merseyside
so... i do not not get you point ( sorry if this soudes rude and nasty it did not mean to) i was just saying from the pic i have in my book is looks like L204 aka flash pleco
Well the thread is named HYPAN ID.. the id you offered was not a hypan. quite easy to distingiush a hypan from a panaque not so easy to tell L270 and L129 apart. Dont worry about sounding rude or nasty, i did not take it that way.
 

macvsog23

Pleco Profiles Team - RIP FRIEND
May 1, 2009
2,671
0
36
71
Bristol
L204 belong to a new genus, Panaqolus I have mistaken L129 for L204 before now when out of water easy mistake to make.
 

Doodles

Retired Staff
Apr 8, 2009
8,786
2
36
That's the problem I just want to let them go but I don't want to pass on fish with a false id.
Should I take some pictures of them? Maybe that will be better.
Thanks for help :)
You could try some in water photos although as said they are pretty small and often mistakes are made with id of juvies imo
 
J

jamous91

Guest
it is clear i am not as good as i think i am i need more onfor and to learn loads