Last post as i think maybe posts are confusing or giving the wrong impression.The concepts being talked about aren't theoretical in the least but are in practical use everyday. See aquaponics as I mentioned previously. Aquaponics is the practice of raising fish and plants together typically for food production. Its not at all a terribly difficult thing to do and the same concepts that we deal with in aquarum keeping apply to aquaponics. If you're used to growing aquarium plants the requirements are similar, just that your plants are grown in a remote grow bed rather than the aquarium and you're dealing with terrestrial plants vice aquatic plants. The biggest difference is that terrrestrial plants require oxygen at the root zone or you could literally drown the plant.
The difficulty that you encounter with growing houseplants, I think, is related to the other posts I made regarding light levels. Indoor light levels are often greatly overestimated due to the human eye's ability to resolve light. With the aquatic plants its probably not as much of an issue simply because you know that you need aquarium lights to grow aquatic plants.
Totally see where you're coming from. My previous post wasn't meant to downplay your concerns as they are legitimate and ones that I too have thought about in regards to this thread. It was more to point out that the concepts have been proven and that the issue you speak if can indeed be addressed by adapting what has been/is currently in practice. I too personally question the feasibility of the project as viewed by the op but as they seem intent to try I hope to provide what tools I can to help them along. Sorry if my post and intentions were not conveyed well.Last post as i think maybe posts are confusing or giving the wrong impression.
I know the ideas are not theoretical and the link shows it can be put into practice in a home environment(I am aware of it used on large scales) but I think for myself if being used in the home it would have to be worth while and I would have to be persuaded a little more to the potential benefits if I was to try and recreate that in my home.
How worthwhile would it be? Is there a more aesthetically pleasing version? If I was to say want "organic veg" then in a home environment how much could you really produce? Is there going to be more equipment than actual tank or fish? What scale are we talking about here? Is it like a trio of lettuce and enough sewerage pipe to plumb a 3 bed house? if you know what I mean?
I get confused myself and have difficulty getting my point across. I am not 100% against it just not 100% convinced yet that is all.
edit:
This is a link which to my eye makes all of it more understandable and potentially more aesthetically pleasing and practical. Other pics and drawings were not quite showing what I needed to see.
http://www.backyardaquaponics.com/component/content/article/4/54-basics.html
I think when I said a tray and use of a hose which could be an external adapted so you could have the plants in planters outside. I think having a pond for this project would be a great advantage if serious about producing enough veg. I f it was just a little window box type size thing with some lettuce then above the tank would be fine providing you can supply enough light. Only thing is how many nutrients will be available for what scale. I don't doubt the putting the system together just what works effectively.
Not sure what this is all about? If it refers to me pointing out that this is aquaponics or the same concept, I really don't care what you call your project. Me refering to it as aquaponics is simply to guide those that don't see it towards a place where the work has already been done and prinicples proven. The conditions you are using might be different and may require some adaptation by there really is no sense in reinventing the wheel.i think maybe Lorne with his best intention wants to be totally accurate. So for Lorne maybe we should from now on refer to this as the dicussion of aquaponics hypothesis. (o lala)
which is;
1.a proposition, or set of propositions, set forth as an explanation for the occurrence of some specified group of phenomena, either asserted merely as a provisional conjecture to guide investigation (working hypothesis) or accepted as highly probable in the light of established facts.
2.
a proposition assumed as a premise in an argument.
3.
the antecedent of a conditional proposition.
or we could just say theory, or maybe hold a poll on the subject and totally get off the point :dk::blink:
[/B]